Digital Radio in the Real World
AES Topics Include NRSC-5 Standard, Copy Protection and the
'Low Bitrate Last Mile'
by Daniel Mansergh
SAN FRANCISCO Radio interests were well represented at this fall's
Audio Engineering Society convention, with much of the buzz revolving
around the potential for new services and technology to enhance
the listening experience.
A panel session on the state of digital radio, a special event
open to all attendees, highlighted how far the industry has come
since the AES first presented a session on the topic 14 years
ago.
The panelists tailored their remarks to a diverse audience of
audio professionals, many of whom were learning about digital
radio for the first time. Even so, the breadth of the presenters
assembled by session organizer and moderator David Bialik, a systems
engineering consultant, ensured that even broadcast engineering
junkies came away with insights.
David Layer, director of advanced engineering for NAB Science
and Technology, led off with an overview of the state of digital
radio rules and standards.
At the FCC, Layer reported, attention is still focused on reviewing
the comments and reply comments in response to the Further Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking and Notice of Inquiry in MB Docket 99-325,
issued in April.
This proceeding, as summarized by Layer, is intended to develop
rules regarding conversion policy, audio quality requirements,
datacasting, the multi-channel service known as Tomorrow Radio,
subscription services, local programming requirements and AM operations.
In its own review of the comments and reply comments, Layer said,
NAB detected a consensus on most of the big items being considered:
Some controversy remains, however, on nighttime AM IBOC operation
and copy protection requirements, which may delay a final decision
in the proceeding, according to Layer. Until the final rules are
adopted, the FCC is continuing to allow IBOC operation upon receipt
of a notification letter.
(At the NAB Radio Show just prior to AES, Jim Bradshaw, an associate
division chief of the Audio Division of the FCC's Media Bureau,
said there would likely be an interim IBOC order released in early
2005 that could discuss AM IBOC nighttime procedures and Tomorrow
Radio. See Radio World Nov. 3, page 14.)
Layer also discussed progress of the National Radio Systems
Committee in developing a technical standard for digital radio,
dubbed NRSC-5. Driven in large part by the desire of the FCC,
consumer electronics manufacturers and broadcasters to have a
single clearly defined industry-developed standard for IBOC, the
NRSC effort is expected "to form the basis for the FCC's technical
rules," Layer said.
The current plan for the IBOC standard, according to Layer,
is to detail only the modulation characteristics of IBOC, leaving
specifications about the audio codec out of the standard. This
addresses concerns of Ibiquity Digital regarding intellectual
property and contractual agreements with other partner companies
involved in the development of the HDC codec.
Reaching 'critical mass'
Michael Lyons, vice president for aftermarket business development
at Ibiquity, gave a snapshot of the HD Radio rollout as seen by
the company behind the IBOC technology.
Much of his discussion was familiar territory for broadcasters
in the audience, but Lyons reported on several recent developments
that show continuing progress in the effort to expand the amount
of programming available on HD Radio and ensure that receivers
are available to consumers.
Lyons reports that Ibiquity now has more than 400 licensees,
with an estimated 150 stations now broadcasting an HD Radio signal.
Lyons cited recent commitments by the large broadcast groups Clear
Channel, Cox and Entercom to deploy HD Radio as a milestone in
the movement towards achieving a "critical mass" of digital broadcast
stations nationwide.
Lyons also was bullish on the outlook for HD Radio receivers
over the coming year.
Admitting that current aftermarket automotive receivers with
street prices ranging from about $500 to $1,000 are "too expensive,"
Lyons advised the audience to look for more manufacturers to release
receivers at a variety of price points throughout the next year.
Lyons expects HD Radio receivers to become optional equipment
in several automakers' luxury offerings in model year 2006.
Lyons also expects home receivers will become available in the
next year in a variety of forms. In particular, he noted the recent
announcement of the Boston Acoustics Recepter HD tabletop radio
as a sign that more equipment would be announced soon.
Tomorrow Radio tests
Jan Andrews, senior engineer at National Public Radio, reviewed
the development and testing progress of the Tomorrow Radio project,
an initiative to allow multi-channel operation within the HD Radio
bitstream. Andrews summarized the results of field tests conducted
on four stations in 2003, which concluded that coverage of the
supplementary audio channel would "fall within the 60 to 70 dBu
service area of a typical FM station," according to the field
test report prepared by the consulting engineering firm Hammett
& Edison.
The encouraging test results led NPR to file comments to the
FCC, requesting that the Tomorrow Radio system be incorporated
as a permissible use under the new rules for digital radio broadcasting.
NPR's assessment of the comments filed in the IBOC proceeding
indicated that the commenters "overwhelmingly support the Supplementary
Audio Channel," according to Andrews. He said NPR anticipates
FCC action on the supplementary audio channel proposal in early
2005.
Andrews also presented results of listening tests conducted
earlier this year to determine the suitability of different bitrates
for various types of program material, with an eye to deriving
a reasonable bitrate allocation between the primary and supplementary
audio channels in a Tomorrow Radio system.
According to listener testing, conducted by Sheffield Audio
Consulting, most listeners could perceive only very small or no
difference between audio encoded with HDC at 96 kbps down to 48
kbps. As has been seen in previous digital codec testing, differences
were most noticeable in samples of human speech, while music samples
tended to survive lower bitrates with less perceptible degradation.
Interestingly, Andrews said, classical music and jazz samples
were comparable to 96 kbps quality down to 36 kbps, while voice
and rock music samples tended to do poorly at that bitrate. The
results suggest that two 48 kbps channels or in some cases a 64/32
kbps split between primary and supplementary audio channels would
be appropriate bitrate allocations for a station broadcasting
two audio channels.
Andrews concluded with a review of another study conducted by
Sheffield Audio Consulting to determine whether the extended hybrid
portion of the HD Radio signal could support one or two low-bitrate
informational audio channels with a variety of audio codecs, such
as one channel of 12 kbps to 25 kbps, or two of less than 12 kbps
each. NPR was trying to determine if radio reading services, many
of which are carried on FM subcarriers, could be improved by incorporating
them into the HD Radio system.
The results indicate that a single low bitrate digital channel
outperforms analog SCA reception for all the codecs tested, including
HD Radio's HDC codec, according to Andrews. For two very low bitrate
channels, only a voice-optimized codec from VoiceAge outperformed
SCA reception, particularly with speech samples.
Digital copyright protection
Fred von Lohmann is a senior staff attorney specializing in
intellectual property matters with the Electronic Frontier Foundation,
a nonprofit group that seeks to protect the rights of Web users.
He reviewed the issues surrounding the Recording Industry Association
of America's petition to the FCC to include copy protection regulations
in the new digital radio rules being considered in Docket 99-325.
From the EFF's perspective, the RIAA proposes "a restrictive
set of conditions" that would make it difficult for everyday listeners
to make convenient fair use recordings of digital radio broadcasts,
as they are able to do with analog broadcasts today.
Von Lohmann found fault with the RIAA's reasons for treating
digital radio broadcasts differently than analog broadcasts, claiming
that for most listeners, there is "no appreciable difference"
between HD Radio and good-quality FM reception.
The focus of FCC Docket 99-325 is now squarely on copy protection,
von Lohmann concluded. As a result, he cautioned audio content
producers, consumers and broadcasters in the audience not to let
their future use of digital radio be dictated by the RIAA today.
David Wilson, director of engineering for the Consumer Electronics
Association, rounded out the panel with a review of the CEA's
recent digital radio-related projects.
Wilson discussed research conducted this summer by the CEA on
consumer demand for both satellite and IBOC digital radio products,
which found a desire for improved radio experiences.
He noted that 98 percent of U.S. vehicles have an AM/FM radio,
while only 2 percent have satellite radio. In addition, 17 percent
of U.S. households plan to buy a new model year 2005 vehicle,
which bodes well for widespread adoption of HD Radio receivers
once they become widely available as OEM equipment.
The research indicated that 73 percent of the U.S. population
is aware of satellite radio, while 42 percent are aware of HD
Radio. "This is impressive," Wilson said, considering how little
mainstream marketing and promotion of HD Radio has been done to
date.
The CEA also is concerned about the potential problems of driver
distraction due to mobile displays, Wilson said. The display of
scrolling PS data on RDS receivers to provide artist and title
information is an application that the manufacturers had not anticipated,
and receiver manufacturers encourage broadcasters to work with
them to ensure that any changes to RDS are consistent with the
HD Radio displays.
This would lead to a more consistent user experience, Wilson
said, whether a listener was tuned to an HD Radio station or to
an analog station with RDS.
Wilson reinforced von Lohmann's comments about copy protection,
noting specifically the "Inducing Infringements of Copyrights
Act of 2004," a bill introduced by Senate Judiciary Chairman Orrin
Hatch, R-Utah, and the committee's ranking Democrat, Patrick Leahy,
D-Vt. Opponents, including CEA, claim S. 2560 would make equipment
manufacturers liable in copyright infringement cases.
"There is a long history of recording capability for AM/FM broadcasts,"
Wilson said, and the CEA would like to see that capability continue.
Finally, Wilson discussed the issue of limiting AM bandwidth
for compatibility with IBOC, and the fact that some broadcasters
have noted improved analog performance with the narrower bandwidth.
Most receivers are already narrowly filtering AM signals to reduce
interference, Wilson said, using this as an example to encourage
broadcasters and equipment manufacturers to work together to ensure
the best experience for listeners.